HOME Quality Enhancement Plan SACS Topics CORE Requirements Main Page
 


TTU Original Statement:

     
2.11

The institution has a sound financial base and demonstrated financial stability, and adequate physical resources to support the mission of the institution and the scope of its programs and services.

The member institution provides the following financial statements: (a) an institutional audit (or Standard Review Report issued in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the AICPA for those institutions audited as part of a systemwide or statewide audit) and written institutional management letter for the most recent fiscal year prepared by an independent certified public accountant and/or an appropriate governmental auditing agency employing the appropriate audit (or Standard Review Report) guide; (b) a statement of financial position of unrestricted net assets, exclusive of plant assets and plant-related debt, which represents the change in unrestricted net assets attributable to operations for the most recent year; and, (c) an annual budget that is preceded by sound planning, is subject to sound fiscal procedures, and is approved by the governing board.

Audit requirements for applicant institutions may be found in the Commission policy entitled "Accreditation Procedures for Applicant Institutions".  (Resources)

     
  * Compliance               ž  Partial Compliance             * Non-Compliance
     
   Narrative: 
   
 

Texas Tech University is in partial compliance with Core Requirement #2.11. 

Texas Tech University does have a sound financial base and financial stability. As an institution whose annual financial information is audited as part of a statewide audit, Texas Tech University will obtain a review in accordance with AICPA Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services for its financial statements for the year ending August 31, 2004.  The Texas State Auditor’s Office will conduct the review and will issue a Standard Review Report and institutional management letter.  The target date for submission of the review report and management letter to SACS is January 15, 2005. 

A statement of financial position of unrestricted net assets, exclusive of plant assets and plant-related debt, which represents the change in unrestricted net assets attributable to operations for the year ending August 31, 2004, will be prepared based on the financial information reviewed by the State Auditor’s Office.  The statement will be accompanied by management discussion and analysis as necessary to explain the financial position and results.  The target date for submission of the supplemental statement is January 15, 2005. Presentation of this documentation will bring the university into compliance with Core Requirement 2.11. 

Annual university budgets for the current and past four fiscal years are available on line at http://www.irs.ttu.edu/Reports/StateReports/TTU/OBudget/default.htm. The Texas Tech University budget planning process is described in Board of Regents Rules 07.04.1-5 (Chapter 7, pp. 13-17, available at http://www.depts.ttu.edu/oppol/Chapter07.pdf).  

Operationally, the budget process begins with discussions between the president and the administrators who report to him. These administrators are: provost and senior vice president for academic affairs, the senior vice president for finance and administration, the vice president for research, the vice president for operations, the vice president for student affairs, and the athletic director. The president notes the strategic areas he wishes to emphasize. The vice presidents work within their areas of responsibility to develop a budget plan, using guidance from the president, the strategic plan, and the assessment reports.  

In prior years the Budget Office produced a paper budget package for each area that contained all of the current fiscal year data with columns to make requests for the next FY. Last year (FY 2004) the university moved to an on-line system that also allows administrators to compare budget allocations for the current FY with new budget requests.  

At each level of decision making the information from the level above is used to evaluate budget requests. Each account manager submits a request to the next highest administrative level. For the Office of the Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs, these come from the department chairs to the deans and, finally, to the provost, with recommendations and justifications for approvals at each level. Ultimately, requests from units (departments, colleges, and operational units in non-academic areas) are assembled at the vice presidential level. The president and senior vice president for finance and administration then meet individually with each senior administrator to evaluate the requests and make final decisions on any funding changes or reallocations from the requests. The president also meets with the vice presidents as a group (the President’s Administrative Council). Budget proposals are also discussed with the President’s Budget Advisory Council (BAC), which looks at the budget implications and helps to identify unintended consequences of budget decisions. The BAC membership is drawn from faculty, staff, deans, and administrators. The BAC reports its findings to the president. Decisions made by the president and the other senior administrators are conveyed to the next lower administrative levels and budget adjustments are made as necessary. Hard decisions on spending cuts or reallocations are made as close to the level at which they will be implemented as possible.  

After adjustments are made to the budget, the president, the senior vice president for finance and administration, and the provost and senior vice president for academic affairs approve the institutional budget. The Budget Office then compiles all budget data into its final form for presentation to the chancellor and the senior vice chancellor for fiscal affairs. The budget that is approved by the chancellor and the board of regents becomes the operating budget for the next fiscal year.  

As would be expected from a large and complex organization, changes in the budget may be required at different points during the fiscal year. Such changes are initiated at the appropriate administrative level and passed through the administrative hierarchy for approval. Final approval comes from the board of regents and is noted in the board minutes (board of regents meeting minutes are available in pdf form at http://www.irs.ttu.edu/Reports/StateReports/SYSTEM/Minutes/default.htm). 

At all stages of the budgeting process, the Division of Administration and Finance is responsible for estimating revenue for the budget period and informing the university administration of any changes that may occur in those estimates. 

The Texas legislature meets in alternate years. The board of regents generally approves the annual budget in a legislative year at its August meeting and in non-legislative years at its May meeting. The university’s fiscal year 2004 budget was approved at the August 8, 2003 meeting, p. 14-15 of the minutes (board of regents meeting minutes are available in pdf form at http://www.irs.ttu.edu/Reports/StateReports/SYSTEM/Minutes/default.htm).
The FY 2003 budget was approved at the May 9-10, 2002 board meeting, p. 13.
The FY 2002 budget was approved at the August 10, 2001 board meeting, p. 28. The FY 2001 budget was approved at the May 11-12, 2000 board meeting, p. 17. Budget adjustments are approved at most board of regents meetings.


Action Plan:

Texas Tech University will submit the required financial documentation to SACS as soon as it becomes available.

       
     
    COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION
    Units:
    Administration and Finance
    Office of Research, Technology Transfer, and Economic Development
    Division of Student Affairs
    Office of the Provost:
      Deans:
      College of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources
      College of Architecture
      College of Arts and Sciences
      College of Education
      College of Engineering
      College of Human Sciences
      Honors College
      Law
      Rawls College of Business
     
      Office of International Affairs
      Teaching, Learning, and Technology Center
      Outreach and Extended Studies
     

 

SACS Off-Site Committee Finding:

2.11      The institution has a sound financial base and demonstrated financial stability, and adequate physical resources to support the mission of the institution and the scope of its programs and services.   

            The member institution provides the following financial statements: (a) an institutional audit (or Standard Review Report issued in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the AICPA for those institutions audited as part of a system wide or statewide audit) and written institutional management letter for the most recent fiscal year prepared by an independent certified public accountant and/or an appropriate governmental auditing agency employing the appropriate audit (or Standard Review Report) guide; (b) a statement of financial position of unrestricted net assets, exclusive of plant assets and plant-related debt, which represents the change in unrestricted net assets attributable to operations for the most recent year; and, (c) an annual budget that is preceded by sound planning, is subject to sound fiscal procedures, and is approved by the governing board. 

Audit requirements for applicant institutions may be found in the Commission policy entitled “Accreditation Procedures for Applicant Institutions.” (Resources) 

___       Compliance
_X_      Non-compliance
___       Did not review
 

Comments: 

Insufficient documentation provided.


TTU Response:
 

A document titled “A Review of Texas Tech University for the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, January 2005, SAO No. 05.309” has been prepared to support the university’s claim of compliance with Core Requirement 2.11. This document is available at http://www.irim.ttu.edu/SACSFocusReport/StateAuditorsReport.pdf  and contains a State Auditor’s Review Report for FY 2004, a financial report, and a management letter, as specified in SACS Core Requirement 2.11. It is our understanding that the Financial Report will substitute for a full audit in Texas, where statewide audits are conducted. 

The State Auditor has noted “[b]ased on our review we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.” 

The management letter states “In the course of our review, which was substantially less in scope than an audit, we did not find any control weaknesses or errors in the financial statements that required modification.” 

We believe the data included in the report demonstrate that the university has a sound financial base and adequate physical resources to support its mission, programs, and services.   

This report, along with the documentation provided in our Compliance Certification document, support the university’s claim to be in compliance with Core Requirement 2.11.

 

     
Click here to return to the main TTU Certification of Compliance Page

These web pages are best viewed using Microsoft Internet Explorer
The documents may appear distorted when viewed using another web browser.

Copyright 2002 Texas Tech University | All Rights Reserved | TTU Privacy Policy | Texas Public Information Act
Maintained by: Department of Institutional Research and Information Management | Contact: Webmaster
Last updated:  Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:24 AM CST.
TTU is not responsible for the content of external sources.