CERTIFICATION OF
COMPLIANCE
| |
|
Name of Unit:
Department of
History |
|
Date:
June 2, 2004 |
|
|
|
Section 3: COMPREHENSIVE STANDARDS |
|
|
|
|
3.3 Institutional
Effectiveness |
|
|
|
|
3.3.1 |
The institution
identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and
its
administrative and educational support services; assesses
whether it achieves these
outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis
of those results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Department of History is in compliance with this
standard.
The department identifies skills and levels of
analysis that it requires for individual courses, majors, and minors in
several places in its Strategic Report and also identifies overall standards
in its vision statement. Our Undergraduate Studies Committee monitors these
standards as does the department chair. The department has established rules
for textbook selection and examination standards that it enforces. Our
capstone course, History 4398 requires students to demonstrate specific
skills in reading, research, organization, and writing that amount to the
equivalent of an exit exam for history majors. The history advisor for
undergraduate programs makes no exceptions to the department’s required
areas of geographic knowledge without the consent of the department chair or
Undergraduate Studies Committee chair.
We have several
meetings of area specialists each year within the department to assess among
other matters the student outcomes in the courses in each area. For example,
the Americanist historians who teach the introductory U.S. survey courses
and the Europeanist historians who teach introductory Western Civilization,
each meet as a group to discuss student performance and demand. These
meetings often result in curriculum changes and changes in pedagogy within
the curriculum already offered. We also offer essay prizes for papers and
request the best papers in each upper-division class to be submitted: this
provides a healthy check and monitor of the performance of the best
students. We also commission a formal survey of majors to be administered by
the Political Science Department survey laboratory to assess student
satisfaction. This report goes to the chair and Executive Committee for
their consideration. We also write all recent graduates and encourage them
to offer thoughts on the program and to stay in touch with the department
after graduation. For graduate students, we hold an annual department
meeting devoted to discussing the program and then we discuss each graduate
student individually—every one of them. For students entering our Ph.D.
program, the student is required to meet with his/her entire committee which
usually consists of five professors to assess the students level of
preparation and the course of study that will be required in order to take
the qualifying Ph.D. exams. The chair of the department examines the student
evaluation scores of all persons teaching in the department; the Executive
Committee examines the scores of all non-tenured members; and the Executive
Committee, two-person committees, and the graduate advisor examine the
scores of all graduate instructors and teaching assistantships. Anomalies in
all cases are noted and discussed among those examining the scores and the
instructors.
Please see at
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/historydepartment/ , Strategic Report, “Mission
Statement,” and “Vision Statement;” and see also Undergraduate Programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROGRAMS |
|
3.4 Educational
Programs
Standards for
All Educational Programs: |
|
(Includes all
on-campus, off-campus and distance learning programs) |
|
3.4.1
|
The institution
demonstrates that each educational program for which academic
credit is
awarded (a) is approved by the faculty and the
administration, and (b) establishes and
evaluates program and learning outcomes. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Department of History is in compliance
with this standard.
All department courses go through a
rigorous vetting to ensure appropriate standards. New proposals
are submitted to the department chair who then submits them to
the Undergraduate Studies Committee. If they are approved at
these levels, they are then sent to all members of the
department for comment and if there are negative comments or
suggestions for re-thinking, the author of the new course, the
Undergraduate Committee members, and the department chair
consider these and reconcile problems before submitting the
proposals to the Arts and Sciences Committee on Academic
Programs where they must, of course, be approved. Graduate
courses go through the same process with the Graduate Studies
Committee and the Graduate School for approval.
Please see Undergraduate Studies Committee
files and Graduate Studies Committee files in History Office,
131 Holden Hall.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.4.6 |
The institution employs
sound and acceptable practices for determining the amount and
level of credit awarded for courses, regardless of format or
mode of delivery. |
|
|
|
|
| |
The Department of History is in compliance
with this standard.
All of our on-campus courses—except for a
small number of individual tutorials that are primarily offered
at the graduate level--meet for the required number of hours
prescribed by the catalog and we make no exceptions. For those
few individual tutorials, we require the faculty member and
student to draw up a contract that specifies the nature,
quantity, and scope of the work to be done and it is available
for examination or discussion. The department offers seven
Extended Studies courses all of which use textbooks that are
comparable—and usually the same—as ones used when the course is
taught on-campus. All of the Study Guides for these courses have
been reviewed in the past two years and five of them have been
revised. They will continue to be reviewed and revised and all
of them require the submission of at least nine assignments
which is more than is required for on-campus cohorts.
Please see Extended Studies Course Guides
in History Office, 131 Holden Hall or in Extended Studies
Office, West Hall.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.4.9 |
The institution provides
appropriate academic support services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Department of History is in compliance
with this standard.
Our advising office is staffed by a
full-time advisor, and students are also encouraged to consult
the department chair, the undergraduate advisor, the graduate
advisor, and members of the Undergraduate Studies Committee and
the Graduate Studies Committee. The graduate advisor does not
permit registration for graduate students unless they have an
annual meeting with him/her. All of our requirements are listed
on our department website, in the university catalog, and are
available on a handout sheet available in the History Department
office. Representatives of the department attend the career and
major-day symposia held by the university and respond to all
e-mail requests for information.
Please see, “Undergraduate Programs”, and
“Graduate Programs”, at
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/historydepartment; or see
“Undergraduate Programs,” and “Graduate
Programs,” fact sheets available in
History Office, 131 Holden Hall or in Undergraduate Advisor’s
and Graduate Advisor’s offices, Holden Hall.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.6 Standards
Specific to Graduate and Post-Baccalaureate Professional
Programs: |
|
|
|
|
3.6.1 |
The institution’s
post-baccalaureate professional degree programs, and its
master’s and
doctoral degree programs are progressively more advanced in
academic content than
undergraduate programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Department of History is in compliance
with this standard.
All undergraduate courses are numbered
4000 and below and graduate courses are numbered 5000, 6000, or
7000. Clear distinctions are drawn. Graduate courses assign much
more reading and always require involvement with primary
materials and extensive writing of usually more than 25 pages
total per course. They incorporate materials that go well beyond
undergraduate courses in depth and sophistication. We require
two explicit methodology courses for all graduate students at
either the M.A. or Ph.D. level. M.A. theses are usually of 70 to
120 typescript pages in length and Ph.D. dissertations are
always over 200 pages and usually well over 300 pages. M.A.
theses require at least two readers who must approve after a
rigorous, public defense and Ph.D. dissertations require at
least three readers and a rigorous public defense. Both theses
and dissertations are submitted to University Microfilms for
microfilm publication. M.A. students who do not write a thesis—a
minority of our M.A. graduates—must pass a comprehensive oral
exam.
Please see “Course Descriptions,”
“Undergraduate Programs,” and “Graduate Programs,” at
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/historydepartment/ and in Texas
Tech University Catalog (History Department). See also copies of
all History Department dissertations and theses in Texas Tech
University Library. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.7 Faculty |
|
|
|
|
3.7.1 |
The institution employs
competent faculty members qualified to accomplish the mission
and goals of the institution. When determining acceptable
qualifications of its faculty, an
institution gives primary consideration to the highest earned
degree in the discipline in
accordance with the guidelines listed below. The institution also
considers competence,
effectiveness, and capacity, including, as appropriate,
undergraduate and graduate degrees,
related work experiences in the field, professional licensure
and certifications, honors and
awards, continuous documented excellence in teaching, or other
demonstrated
competencies and achievements that contribute to effective
teaching and student learning
outcomes. For all cases, the institution is responsible for
justifying and documenting the
qualifications of all its faculty. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Department of History is in compliance
with this standard.
All of our faculty have Ph.D. degrees in
history or in one case in Classics which is appropriate for a
scholar teaching ancient history. All faculty members who teach
graduate courses are members of the Graduate Faculty and are
reviewed formally every six years. A record of continuing
serious scholarship is required to stay on the Graduate Faculty
and this scholarship must be vouchsafed by the publication of
books, articles, or appropriate government reports and by active
participation in the discipline of history which must be
demonstrated through the presentation of conference papers or
academic lectures and other scholarly involvement such as
editorial work, book reviewing, and solicited assessments.
All GPTIs (with or without M.A.s) are
required to submit their syllabi to the Department Chair and the
faculty member assigned to supervise graduate instructors and
T.A.s. All GPTIs must use a textbook and ancillary texts
approved by the department. All must conform to department
standards set for grading schema. All GPTIs must take our
special course for graduate students who are TAs or GPTIs in
their first year as instructors. All GPTIs are supervised and
evaluated by a faculty committee of two members who write a
written report which is given to the GPTI and to the Chair and
Departmental Executive in order to identify strengths and
weaknesses of the GPTI.
Please see “Faculty,” at
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/historydepartment; and please see
“Faculty Spreadsheets” (2004) deposited with Associate Dean of
Arts and Sciences, R. Stewart.
|
| |
|
|
|
3.7.3 |
The institution
provides evidence of ongoing professional development of faculty
as
teachers, scholars, and practitioners. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Department of History is in compliance
with this standard.
The department encourages faculty members
to apply for grants, leaves, and other professional
opportunities; it supports travel to conferences to deliver
academic papers or to take part in symposia; it brings in at
least 15 scholarly speakers a year to interact with faculty and
students; it has a system of internal colloquia which hones and
burnishes academic skills; and the department rewards those
faculty that publish scholarly work. Our Strategic Report
specifically identifies goals of intellectual attainment and
development in several places and our local culture shows that
we prize scholarly accomplishment. In most years, 100% of our
faculty have either published serious contribution to historical
literature or have them accepted for publication. Our yearly
evaluations require annual evidence of scholarly accomplishment
for every faculty member.
Please see at
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/historydepartment : Strategic
Report, Goal 2, “Academic Excellence,” Objectives 2.1, 2.2, 2.3,
and 2.4; Goal 5,”Partnerships,” Goal 5, Objectives, 5.2, and
5.3; and Goal 6, “Human Resources,” Objective 6.2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|