| |
|
Name of Unit:
Division of Enrollment Management |
|
Date:
August 19, 2004 |
|
|
|
Section 2: CORE REQUIREMENTS |
| |
|
|
|
2.1
|
The institution has degree-granting authority from the
appropriate government agency or agencies.
(Degree-granting Authority) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.2
|
The institution has a governing board of at least five members
that is the legal body with specific authority over the
institution. The board is an active policy-making body for the
institution and is
ultimately responsible for ensuring that the
financial resources of the institution are adequate to provide a
sound educational program. The board is not controlled by a
minority of board members or
by organizations or interests
separate from it. Neither the presiding officer of the board nor
the majority of other voting members of the board have
contractual, employment, or personal or familial
financial
interest in the institution.
A military institution authorized
and operated by the federal government to award degrees has a
public board in which neither the presiding officer nor a
majority
of the other members are civilian employees of the
military or active/retired military. The board has broad and
significant influence upon the institution’s programs and
operations, plays an active role in
policy-making, and ensures
that the financial resources of the institution are used to
provide a sound educational program. The board is not controlled
by a minority of board members or by organizations
or interests
separate from the board except as specified by the authorizing
legislation. Neither the presiding officer of the board nor the
majority of other voting board members have contractual,
employment, or personal or familial financial interest in the
institution. (Governing Board)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.3 |
The institution has a chief executive officer whose primary
responsibility is to the institution and who is not the
presiding officer of the board. (Chief Executive
Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.4
|
The institution has a clearly defined and published mission
statement specific to the institution and appropriate to an
institution of higher education, addressing teaching and
learning and, where applicable, research and public service.
(Institutional Mission) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.5
|
The institution engages in
ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based
planning and evaluation processes that incorporate a systematic
review of programs and services that (a)
results in continuing
improvement and (b) demonstrates that the institution is
effectively accomplishing its mission.
(Institutional
Effectiveness) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Division of
Enrollment Management is in compliance with this requirement.
Enrollment
Management
Policies, programs and procedures that influence undergraduate
and graduate student recruitment and retention are reviewed by
the Enrollment Management Council. Council membership includes
undergraduate and graduate students, as well as representatives
from each of the colleges, the advising center, Admissions,
Financial Aid, the Registrar’s Office, Fiscal Affairs,
Information Technology and Student Affairs.
The first goal of the University strategic plan outlines the
commitment to “recruit, retain and graduate a larger, more
academically prepared and more diverse student body.” One
objective is to create “an integrated enrollment management plan
including policies, procedures and activities that incorporate
university and college enrollment priorities.” The Enrollment
Management strategic plan echoes this commitment and also
includes the following goals: increase undergraduate retention
and graduation rates, and utilize technology to improve
enrollment management processes and services.
During the time that strategic plans were developed, House Bill
1678 was passed and directed the Texas Higher Education Board to
“develop and annually update a uniform strategy to identify,
attract, enroll and retain students that reflect the population
of the state.”
In
the spring of 2001, members of the Enrollment Management Council
formed a steering committee with the purpose of creating an
enrollment management plan to address the goals of the
University and the state. Objectives of the plan included the
following: determining optimal enrollment in light of faculty,
staff, space, and financial resources, as well as student
support services; developing a plan for effectively marketing
the University to prospective students, particularly diverse and
high-achieving students; projecting how enrollment will change
over the next five years; and suggesting what new resources or
actions are needed to accommodate the anticipated enrollment
growth. In October of 2002, the University’s Enrollment
Management Plan was submitted to the Texas Higher Education
Coordinating Board and the first assessment was completed a year
later.
Annual assessments of the Enrollment Management strategic plan
and the Enrollment Management Plan reveal progress toward goals
of the institution and the state. Both the Enrollment
Management Plan and its assessment can be accessed at
http://www.ttu.edu/enrmgt/.
The University and Enrollment Management strategic plans can be
found at
http://www.ttu.edu/stratplan/ and
http://www.ttu.edu/enrmgt/strategic_plan.php .
Office of Admissions
The
Office of Admissions’ strategic plan corresponds with the goals
that are found in the University’s strategic plan. Our goals
are to increase access and diversity, recruit and enroll an
academically prepared student body, engage the University
community and external groups in recruitment efforts, utilize
technology to streamline admission processes and improve
internal departmental relations. The strategic plan for the
Office of Admissions can be accessed at
http://www.srel.ttu.edu/stratplan.asp .
Office of
Financial Aid
The Financial Aid
Office planning and assessment process is defined by a
leadership team. During weekly meetings, the team outlines
goals and time lines for the Financial Aid Office and financial
aid process. These time lines include current (academic year
time line) as well as future time lines. The team members
consist of the Associate Director for Technology, the lead
office programmer, Assistant Director for Operations, Assistant
Director for Client Services, Assistant Director for NCAA
Compliance, Assistant Director for Scholarships, Senior Advisor
for Training and Publications, and the office Business Manager.
Each of these members represents an area of the financial aid
team that provides input into budgetary needs of the office
prior to the beginning of the budgeting cycle. Updates
regarding progress on previously identified tasks are given and
new programs, processes or services requiring attention and
adjustments are necessary are identified. A performance
measurement system is being built for the Financial Aid Office
to enable managers at all levels to identify, monitor and
analyze the key performance measurements such as customer
satisfaction, internal processes and growth and improvement
activities.
The planning and
assessment process has resulted in significant improvements in
communication for all aspects of the Financial Aid Office. In
addition, significant improvements in communication with other
University departments such as Student Business Services,
Graduate School, Law School, Financial Accounting, Governmental
Relations, Admissions and the Registrar’s Office are being
experienced. The strategic plan for the Office of Financial Aid
can be accessed at
http://www.fina.ttu.edu/forms/Strategic Plan Financial Aid.pdf.
Office of the
Registrar
Four groups of
employees in the Office of the Registrar complete strategic plan
assessments. Each group is responsible for assessing one of the
four goals in the strategic plan. Attached is the timeline that
shows when the assessment groups meet annually. In addition,
the Office of the Registrar created a Strategic Plan Operational
Manual that includes all assessment group meeting minutes as
well as assessed office statistics reported in the annual
strategic plan assessment. The strategic plan for the Office of
the Registrar can be accessed at
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/registrar/Strat_Plan_03-04.pdf.
Advising Center at
Texas Tech (ACTT)
In addition
to the annual assessment process, there are evaluation forms for
each event such as the Orientation Parent Program; first
generation college student (FGC student) Workshops; and an
annual assessment and review of the Pioneers in Education:
Generations Achieving Scholarship and Unprecedented Success
(PEGASUS) Program.
As a result
of the strategic planning process, ACTT has been able to show
the need for full-time staff to work with increased numbers of
students. From 2000 to 2002, the services of this
University-wide academic advising office were evaluated and a
shift was made from a scheduling office that revolved around
registration and orientation to a year-round service delivery
system. Positions were upgraded and full-time advisors replaced
part-time graduate students.
The
evaluation process included assessment through the strategic
planning process, focus groups of staff and students, and
holding staff members accountable to their position description
questionnaires. Additionally, advising models of successful
university-wide advising centers were researched and
considered. The strategic plan for ACTT can be accessed at
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/actt/StrategicPlan.asp.
McNair Scholars
Program
Since 1996, the Texas Tech
University McNair Scholars Program has engaged in program
evaluation through annual end-of-the-year performance
evaluations and interim reports to the U.S. Department of
Education. Through these documents, the program reports
performance on the McNair Scholars Program objectives as
outlined in the McNair Scholars Program grant application for
each grant cycle. Copies of these documents are kept in the
Associate Director’s files.
End-of-the-year performance
reports to the U.S. Department of Education are submitted each
December and present the prior year’s activities and student
outcomes. In addition, the program submits updated individual
data records for each program participant served since 1995.
These records document each participant’s current educational
level. Interim reports are submitted every April and document
the program’s progress on grant objectives for the first six
months of the program year and include six months of
expenditures-to-date, planned program expenditures for the
remainder of the year and projected expenditures for the next
budget cycle.
Information from strategic
planning and end-of-the-year performance reports have led to the
addition of a graduate student assistant, an increased return
rate on faculty mentor evaluations and the implementation of a
University-funded sophomore year component that will allow
Scholars to begin the program in the spring of their sophomore
year. This provides Scholars with more time to prepare for the
research experience and relieves pressure to complete program
components during Scholars’ first semester in the program. It
also allows program staff to ensure that new students are
committed to the experience before providing them with the
federally funded stipend. This gives new Scholars a
probationary period in the program. The current McNair
strategic plan can be accessed at
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/mcnair/McNair_Strat_Plan2003-2004.htm. Documents related to previous
strategic planning can be found in the McNair shared files at
T:\Asst_Director\Kelly Documents\Dept. Assessment. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.6 |
The institution is in
operation and has students enrolled in degree programs.
(Continuous Operation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.7 |
The institution |
| |
2.7.1 |
offers one or
more degree programs based on at least 60 semester credit hours or
the equivalent at the associate level; at least 120 semester credit
hours or the equivalent at the baccalaureate level; or at least 30
semester credit hours or the equivalent at the
post-baccalaureate, graduate, or professional level. The institution
provides a written justification and rationale for program
equivalency. (Program Length) |
| |
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
|
| |
2.7.2 |
offers degree programs that embody a coherent
course of study that is compatible with its stated purpose and
is based upon fields of study appropriate to higher education.
(Program Content) |
| |
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
|
| |
2.7.3 |
requires in each undergraduate degree program
the successful completion
of a general education component at the collegiate level that is
(1) a substantial component of each undergraduate degree, (2)
ensures breadth of knowledge, and (3) is based on a coherent
rationale. For degree completion in
associate programs, the component constitutes a minimum of 15
semester hours or the equivalent; for baccalaureate programs, a
minimum of 30 semester
hours or the equivalent. These credit
hours are to be drawn from and include at least one course from
each of the following areas: humanities/fine arts;
social/behavioral sciences; and natural
science/mathematics. The
courses do not narrowly focus on those skills, techniques, and
procedures specific to a particular occupation or profession.
The institution provides a written
justification and rationale
for course equivalency. (General Education) |
| |
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
|
| |
2.7.4 |
provides instruction for all course work
required for at least one degree program at each
level at which if awards degree. If the institution
makes arrangements for some
instruction to be provided
by other accredited institutions or entities through contracts
or consortia, or
uses some
other alternative approach to meeting this requirement, the
alternative approach must be approved by the Commission on
Colleges. In all cases, the institution demonstrates that
it controls all aspects of its educational program.
(Contractual Agreements for
Instruction) |
| |
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.8 |
The number of full-time faculty members is
adequate to support the mission of the institution. The
institution has adequate faculty resources to ensure the quality
and integrity of its academic
programs. In addition, upon
application for candidacy, an applicant institution demonstrates
that it meets the comprehensive standard for faculty
qualifications.
(Faculty) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.9. |
The institution, through ownership or formal
arrangements or agreements, provides and supports student and
faculty access and user privileges to adequate library
collections as well as to other
learning/information resources
consistent with the degrees offered. These collections and
resources are sufficient to support all its educational,
research, and public service programs. (Learning
Resources and Services) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 2.10 |
The institution provides student support
programs, services, and activities consistent with its mission
that promote student learning and enhance the development of its
students. (Student Support Services) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Division of
Enrollment Management is in compliance with this requirement.
Enrollment
Management
In an effort to provide a more
seamless transfer process for community college students, the
Office of Enrollment Management initiated the Pathway Program in
2002. The primary goals of the initiative are to increase
awareness about the educational opportunities available at Texas
Tech; promote an understanding of the personal and financial
value of a college education; and encourage currently enrolled
students to complete their associate degrees. Agreements have
been initiated with 25 community colleges throughout Texas and
one community college in New Mexico.
Community college students
participating in the Pathway Program have opportunities to visit
the Texas Tech University and Texas Tech University Health
Sciences Center campuses; are provided with information and
advisement on their community college campuses twice each
semester; can utilize the on-line Degree Planning and Transfer
Credits System to determine the transferability of courses and
view Texas Tech degree plans; can participate in on-line chats
with Texas Tech advisors; and may be eligible for Presidential
Transfer Scholarships.
In 2003, a full-time position was
dedicated to the Pathway Program with the purpose of developing
established partnerships and fully implementing elements of the
Pathway Program.
Office of Admissions
The
University strategic plan goal “To recruit, retain and graduate
a larger, more academically prepared and more diverse student
body” directly impacts the Office of Admissions. As the
University’s reputation continues to grow, the Office of
Admissions works to increase the awareness of the University’s
academic strength and the value of a Texas Tech degree to
targeted students, parents and counselors.
To accomplish the charge of
recruiting a more academically prepared and diverse class, the
Office of Admissions:
-
Automatically
admits those students who are in the top 10% of their
graduating classes and those meeting automatic admission
requirements based on rank and test score.
-
Holistically
reviews those applicants not in the top 10% of their
graduating classes or not meeting assured admission
requirements. Currently, a holistic review considers:
-
curriculum
strength
-
extracurricular
activities, including volunteer service
-
first generation
status
-
low
socioeconomic status
-
work experience
-
extenuating
circumstances
-
association with
Texas Tech University
-
Since 1999, the
average SAT score of the entering class has increased from
1095 to 1123.
-
Since 2000, 50%
of the freshman class has ranked in the top 25% of their
graduating class.
-
Works with the
University community to develop a marketing plan that provides
prospective students and parents with information that will
lead them to see Texas Tech as a university of choice.
-
Is developing an
intensive marketing plan that is designed for students of
color and students who rank in the top 10% of their graduating
classes and have a 1200 SAT score or higher. The marketing
plan will highlight a variety of academic opportunities.
-
Targets transfer
students from partner Pathway Program community colleges and
students who have been inducted into Phi Theta Kappa, an honor
society found on community college campuses. Through a
variety of mailings and visits to campus, students attending
community colleges are made aware of opportunities at Texas
Tech.
Office of Financial Aid
The
Financial Aid Office supports its mission in providing student
support programs, services and activities consistent with the
University’s mission. This is demonstrated with our development
of a new Web site which is targeted to each aid recipient group,
i.e., undergraduate students, graduate students, law students
and study abroad students. This Web site will allow each group
access to financial aid information pertinent to their
individual needs. In addition, the Financial Aid Office is
developing a new Financial Aid Handbook and an electronic award
system which will help students navigate the financial aid
process. In an effort to reach out to students, we now meet in
the Student Union Building and offer financial aid services so
that students are not required to come to the Financial Aid
Office. These services will help meet the needs of students as
they go through the financial aid process.
Office of the Registrar
The Office of the Registrar’s strategic plan includes as goals
the delivery of quality customer service and the utilization of
technological advancements. This commitment is evidenced in the continual
improvement of on-line services provided to students. In
conjunction with the Office of Admissions, the Office of the
Registrar created a Web site that allows former students to
quickly re-enroll. For students’ convenience, the following
forms are made available online: returning student, name/social
security number change, petition for grade replacement,
withdrawal request, transcript order, PIN request, Texas Success
Initiative compliance and transfer pre-evaluation.
Additionally, the Office of the Registrar evaluates all transfer
student course work upon application to the University and
creates, maintains and provides University transcripts to
students.
Advising Center at Texas Tech (ACTT)
A University strategic plan goal
is to “Provide
programs and services that disseminate knowledge and skills and
that enhance the quality of life.” The hallmark of higher
education is learning about thinking. Academic advising at ACTT
includes working with students to learn about the critical
thinking process and decision-making. The process is imbedded
in each conversation between students and advisors, is built
into the schedule approval Web site (SAW), and is the foundation
of the DISCOVERY! program that assists students in the
decision-making process of choosing an academic major.
Academic
advising is an academic and education support process. At ACTT,
academic advising is a systematic, holistic, developmental and
student learning process. It is based on close student-advisor
relationships where students learn about critical thinking and
decision-making. This is done through the process of assisting
students through college transitions and assisting them in
achieving personal, educational and career goals.
McNair Scholars Program
The
McNair Scholars Program provides support to first generation
college students from limited income backgrounds to ensure
Scholars’ academic success in their undergraduate program and to
prepare Scholars for successful entry into and completion of a
graduate program. Services provided to Scholars through the
program include:
-
An undergraduate
research experience under the guidance of a faculty member
-
Mentoring by a
graduate student in the appropriate discipline concerning
graduate student culture
-
One-to-one
weekly meetings with program staff to monitor Scholar progress
and promote utilization of University and program services
-
Crisis advising
and referrals to support services
-
Tutoring
-
Semimonthly
workshops to inform Scholars of the skills and information
needed to be successful at the graduate level
-
Funding for
Scholars to travel to present research results, attend
professional conferences or conduct a graduate school site
visit
-
Laptop computers
for Scholars to check out overnight
-
Computer lab
-
Scholarships for
Scholars who successfully complete semester requirements
-
Assistance with
graduate school applications
-
Scholar
study/activity area in the McNair Office
-
Resource books
in the McNair library
A detailed description of these services can be found
in the McNair Scholars Handbook which is distributed to new
Scholars at the beginning of their program participation. These
services are designed to provide a holistic approach to student
support. The program staff monitors not only academic
performance but personal issues that may impact student
performance. Faculty mentors provide Scholars with valuable
information on conducting research. The research experience not
only gives Scholars a valuable asset for graduate school
applications but it is meant to prepare them for the type of
research work required at the graduate level. As all of the
Scholars are from limited income backgrounds, the opportunity to
attend and participate in a professional conference gives them
the opportunity to compete and interact with peers in their
discipline. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 2.11 |
The institution has a sound
financial base and demonstrated financial stability, and
adequate physical resources to support the mission of the
institution and the scope of its programs and services.
The
member institution provides the following financial statements: (a)
an institutional audit (or Standard Review Report issued in
accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and
Review Services issued by the AICPA for those institutions
audited as part of a systemwide or
statewide audit) and written institutional management letter for the most recent
fiscal year
prepared by an independent certified public
accountant and/or an appropriate governmental auditing agency employing the
appropriate audit (or Standard Review Report) guide; (b) a
statement of financial position of unrestricted net assets,
exclusive of plant assets and plant-related debt, which
represents the change in unrestricted net assets attributable to
operations for
the most recent year; and, (c) an annual budget
that is preceded by sound planning, is subject to sound fiscal
procedures, and is approved by the governing board.
Audit
requirements for applicant institutions may be found in the
Commission policy entitled "Accreditation Procedures for
Applicant Institutions.
(Resources) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
| |
|
| 2.12 |
The institution
has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan and
demonstrate that the plan is part of an ongoing planning and
evaluation process. (Quality Enhancement Plan).
(Not
applicable for the Compliance Certification submitted by
institution). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Section 3: COMPREHENSIVE STANDARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional
Mission, Governance, And Effectiveness |
|
3.1 Institutional
Mission |
|
|
|
|
3.1.1
|
The institution
has a clear and comprehensive mission statement that guides it;
is approved
by the governing board; is periodically reviewed by the board;
and is communicated to the
institution’s constituencies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2 Governance and
Administration |
|
|
|
|
3.2.1 |
The governing
board of the institution is responsible for the selection and
the evaluation of
the chief executive officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.2 |
The legal
authority and operating control of the institution are clearly
defined for the following
areas within the institution’s governance structure: |
| |
3.2.2.1 |
the institution’s
mission; |
| |
3.2.2.2 |
the fiscal
stability of the institution; |
| |
3.2.2.3 |
institutional policy, including policies concerning related
and affiliated corporate
entities and all auxiliary services; |
| |
3.2.2.4 |
related foundations (athletic, research, etc.) and other
corporate entities whose
primary purpose is to support the institution and/or its
programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.3 |
The board has a policy
addressing conflict of interest for its members. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.4 |
The governing board is free
from undue influence from political, religious, or other
external
bodies, and protects the institution from such influence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.5 |
Members of the governing
board can be dismissed only for cause and by due process. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.6 |
There is a clear and
appropriate distinction, in writing and practice, between the
policy-making
functions of the governing board and the responsibility of the
administration and
faculty to administer and implement policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.7 |
The institution
has a clearly defined and published organizational structure
that delineates
responsibility for the administration of policies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.8 |
The institution has
qualified administrative and academic officers with the
experience,
competence, and capacity to lead the institution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 3.2.9 |
The institution
defines and publishes policies regarding appointment and
employment of
faculty and staff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.10 |
The institution evaluates
the effectiveness of its administrators, including the chief
executive
officer, on a periodic basis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Division of
Enrollment Management is in compliance with this requirement.
Enrollment
Management
Department directors are
evaluated annually by the Associate Vice President for
Enrollment Management. Copies of all evaluations are maintained
in individual departments and in Personnel.
Office of Admissions
Each year, employees are
evaluated by their immediate supervisor. Employees have the
opportunity to provide input regarding their job performance
before the actual evaluation. The result of the evaluation is a
document that provides directions and a plan of action if
improvement is needed.
Office of Financial Aid
As a part of the annual process,
evaluations are heavily weighed for merit consideration if funds
are allocated for merit increases. Specific areas evaluated
include items such as customer/personal relations, relationships
with customers and fellow employees, and overall ratings.
Office of the Registrar
In addition to the annual evaluation, employees of the Office of
the Registrar are evaluated in June of each year. These
evaluations are kept in the Registrar’s Office.
Advising Center at Texas Tech (ACTT)
Additional staff performance
evaluations are conducted mid-year. As a result of the
strategic planning process, ACTT has been able to show the need
for full-time staff to work with increased numbers of students.
From 2000 to 2002, ACTT evaluated the services of this
University-wide academic advising office and shifted from a
scheduling office that revolved around registration and
orientation to a year-round service delivery system. Positions
were upgraded, and full-time advisors replaced part-time
graduate students.
As a result, the staff has become
stable, resulting in less time spent on three annual cycles of
recruiting, hiring and training. A stable work force has
resulted in more accurate information being provided to
students, more available time for advising students one-to-one
and working in small group workshops, and available time for the
refinement of programs and processes to better serve students.
McNair Scholars Program
In addition to annual performance
evaluations, full-time employees receive mid-year updates.
Mid-year evaluations are maintained in the McNair Scholars
Program Office. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.11 |
The institution’s
chief executive officer has ultimate responsibility for, and
exercises
appropriate administrative and fiscal control over, the
institution’s intercollegiate athletics
program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.12 |
The institution’s
chief executive officer has ultimate control of the
institution’s fund-raising
activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.13 |
Any
institution-related foundation not controlled by the
institution has a contractual or other
formal agreement that (a) accurately describes the relationship
between the institution and
the foundation, and (b) describes any liability associated with
that relationship. In all cases,
the institution ensures that the relationship is consistent with
its mission. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.14 |
The institution’s
policies are clear concerning ownership of materials,
compensation,
copyright issues, and the use of revenue derived from the
creation and production of all
intellectual property. This applies to students, faculty and
staff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 Institutional
Effectiveness |
|
|
|
|
3.3.1 |
The institution
identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and
its
administrative and educational support services; assesses
whether it achieves these
outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis
of those results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Division of
Enrollment Management is in compliance with this requirement.
Enrollment
Management
The 2003
Enrollment Management strategic plan assessment (http://www.irs.ttu.edu/SACS/AssessmentReports/52_0_2003.pdf)
reveals progress toward divisional and institutional goals
regarding the composition of the student body. From Fall 2002
to Fall 2003, total enrollment increased 3.6% and freshman class
enrollment increased 7.3%. The mean SAT score for the Fall 2003
class was 1123, exceeding by 11 points the record set in 2001
and 2002. The 2003 retention rate of 82% matches the record set
in 2002 and the graduation rate rose to a record high of 55%,
which is the fourth consecutive year that the graduation rate
has improved. The Enrollment Management strategic plan is
updated and assessed annually.
The annual
assessment of the Enrollment Management Plan was completed in
December of 2003. In addition to the Enrollment Management
strategic plan assessments reported above, the following data
reflect the University’s progress toward the state’s charge to
“identify, attract, enroll and retain students that reflect the
population of the state.”
Goal 1.
Access and Diversity: Recruit, retain and graduate a larger,
more academically prepared, and more diverse student body.
-
The 2003
graduate student enrollment grew 4.5% and the 4,282 enrollment
represents the largest graduate student enrollment in Texas
Tech history.
-
Student credit
hour production reached a record high of 359,863, an increase
of 4.8% from 2002.
Goal 2.
Academic Excellence: Attain national recognition as a top public
educational research university.
-
The 2002 State
Board for Educator Certification accountability system for
education preparation reported a cumulative ExCET passing rate
of 91.47% for the University.
-
The total number
of tenure track and tenured faculty rose from 837 to 888 in
2002, an increase of 6.9%.
Goal 3. Engagement: Provide programs and services
that disseminate knowledge and skills and that enhance the
quality of life.
-
The College of
Engineering has developed substantial and significant outreach
efforts. An Engineering Academy has been established at
Estacado High School. A very successfully program, Building
Computers, Communities and Families, has been developed,
implemented and exported.
-
KTXT-TV’s Ready
to Learn outreach initiative provided 49 workshops for
teachers and/or parents of preschool and primary age children
involving 1,006 adults and, in turn, impacting 7,251 children.
Goal 4. Technology: Benefit from the use of
technology in the delivery of services.
-
the Degree
Planning and Transfer Credits System to deliver Internet-based
student recruiting tools to provide the University with a
competitive advantage.
-
Fiscal Affairs
developed a Web-based system to provide students on-line
access to their tuition and fee information.
Goal 5. Partnerships: Build strategic partnerships
and alliances with external entities.
-
Student Affairs,
in partnership with the Lubbock Chamber of Commerce,
established Focus Lubbock, a Leadership Lubbock program for
college students.
-
Hill Country
alliances with groups in Marble Falls and Fredericksburg
resulted in an off-campus site at each location.
Goal 7. Tradition and Pride: Develop a national image based
on Texas Tech traditions and pride in achievements.
-
The first
elements of the First Year Experience Program-Red Raider Camp,
Summer Reading Program and Freshman Convocation-are planned or
implemented.
-
College of
Engineering students are maintaining a better than 90% pass
rate for the fundamentals of engineering examination.
Office of
Admissions
Transfer Students
In order to
facilitate the transition of students from a community college
to Texas Tech and to increase the number of Texas residents
completing a bachelor’s degree, Texas Tech has signed agreements
with 25 community colleges in Texas and one institution in New
Mexico. The Pathway Program is designed to increase awareness
about the educational opportunities available at Texas Tech;
promote an understanding of the personal and financial value of
a college education; and encourage currently enrolled students
to complete their associate degrees. In combination, the
following services provide a more seamless transfer process for
community college students:
-
Students have
the opportunity to visit the Texas Tech University and Texas
Tech University Health Sciences Center campuses twice during
the year.
-
Texas Tech
admissions counselors provide information and advisement to
students during visits to community college campuses twice
each semester.
-
Students can
det |