HOME Quality Enhancement Plan SACS Topics Compliance Home
  CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 
 
Name of Unit: Graduate School
Date: June 21, 2004
 

Section 2: CORE REQUIREMENTS

     
2.1 The institution has degree-granting authority from the appropriate government agency or agencies.  (Degree-granting Authority)
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
     
2.2

The institution has a governing board of at least five members that is the legal body with specific authority over the institution. The board is an active policy-making body for the institution and is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the financial resources of the institution are adequate to provide a sound educational program. The board is not controlled by a minority of board members or by organizations or interests separate from it. Neither the presiding officer of the board nor the majority of other voting members of the board have contractual, employment, or personal or familial financial interest in the institution.

A military institution authorized and operated by the federal government to award degrees has a public board in which neither the presiding officer nor a majority
of the other members are civilian employees of the military or active/retired military. The board has broad and significant influence upon the institution’s programs and operations, plays an active role in policy-making, and ensures that the financial resources of the institution are used to provide a sound educational program. The board is not controlled by a minority of board members or by organizations or interests separate from the board except as specified by the authorizing legislation. Neither the presiding officer of the board nor the majority of other voting board members have contractual, employment, or personal or familial financial interest in the institution.  (Governing Board)

 

     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
     
     
2.3 The institution has a chief executive officer whose primary responsibility is to the institution and who is not the presiding officer of the board. (Chief Executive Officer)
     
  Narrative:  Not applicable to unit level.
 

 

 
     
2.4 The institution has a clearly defined and published mission statement specific to the institution and appropriate to an institution of higher education, addressing teaching and learning and, where applicable, research and public service. (Institutional Mission)
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
2.5 The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that incorporate a systematic review of programs and services that (a) results in continuing improvement and (b) demonstrates that the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission. (Institutional Effectiveness)
     
 

The Graduate School is in compliance with this requirement.

The Graduate School engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes.  These activities are reflected in the TTU strategic plan.  The strategic plan for the Graduate School may be found at

The strategic plan for the Graduate School may be found here:
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/Images/Academics/strategic_plan/StrategicPlan.htm

 
Planning process are shown as “strategies” and evaluation processes are shown as “assessments”

In addition to the Strategic Plan, which is reviewed periodically, the Graduate School conducts Program Reviews of the graduate programs of all the departments and colleges at TTU.  From 1972 to 1985, these reviews were in place.  In 1985, a budget crisis forced TTU to scale back on such activities.  In 1999-2000, the reviews were reinstituted, and, since then, twenty-four units have been reviewed.  All of the data pertaining to these reviews are available in the Graduate Dean’s office.

Examples of continuing improvement may be found at Graduate School offices.  The document is labeled

“Name of Program, Graduate Program Review, 1997-2003”  
As an Example:  “Civil Engineering, Graduate Program Review, 1996-2002”

These planning and evaluation processes directly support our mission and can be found here:  http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/review_guidelines.htm  

This document contains the schedule of graduate program reviews needed to review all program at the Texas Tech, type of information gathered for review, preparation of self study, selection of review committee members, the review process, assessment of report, action of the Dean, and the follow up.

     
     
2.6 The institution is in operation and has students enrolled in degree programs.  (Continuous Operation)
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
2.7 The institution
  2.7.1   offers one or more degree programs based on at least 60 semester credit hours or the equivalent at the associate level; at least 120 semester credit hours or the equivalent at the baccalaureate level; or at least 30 semester credit hours or the equivalent at the post-baccalaureate, graduate, or professional level. The institution provides a written justification and rationale for program equivalency. (Program Length)
     
    The Graduate School is in compliance with this requirement.

All graduate programs require at least 30 semester credit hours; see page 65 (“Master’s Programs) and on page 67 (Ph.D. programs) of the Texas Tech University Catalog, 2003-2004.  http://www.depts.ttu.edu/officialpublications/catalog/Catalog.html

     
     
  2.7.2 offers degree programs that embody a coherent course of study that is compatible with its stated purpose and is based upon fields of study appropriate to higher education. (Program Content)
     
   

The Graduate School is in compliance with this requirement.

All new courses and programs are reviewed and approved by faculty committees.  The guidelines for new programs may be found in

http://www.depts.ttu.edu/opmanual/OP36.04.htm

The Graduate Council has a subcommittee for program review.  The subcommittee reviews all new programs and program changes and then makes recommendations to the Graduate Council as a whole.  The faculty members proposing the new programs or program changes are asked to present the details of their program to the Graduate Council.  Upon approval of the program, the program is then sent to the Academic Council for their approval and then to the Provost.

     
     
  2.7.3 requires in each undergraduate degree program the successful completion of a general education component at the collegiate level that is (1) a substantial component of each undergraduate degree, (2) ensures breadth of knowledge, and (3) is based on a coherent rationale. For degree completion in associate programs, the component constitutes a minimum of 15 semester hours or the equivalent; for baccalaureate programs, a minimum of 30 semester hours or the equivalent. These credit hours are to be drawn from and include at least one course from each of the following areas: humanities/fine arts; social/behavioral sciences; and natural science/mathematics. The courses do not narrowly focus on those skills, techniques, and procedures specific to a particular occupation or profession. The institution provides a written justification and rationale for course equivalency. (General Education)
     
     Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
     
     
  2.7.4 provides instruction for all course work required for at least one degree program at each level at which if awards degree.  If the institution makes arrangements for some instruction to be provided by other accredited institutions or entities through contracts or consortia, or uses some other alternative approach to meeting this requirement, the alternative approach must be approved by the Commission on Colleges.  In all cases, the institution demonstrates that it controls all aspects of its educational program.  (Contractual Agreements for Instruction)
     
     Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
     
     
2.8 The number of full-time faculty members is adequate to support the mission of the institution. The institution has adequate faculty resources to ensure the quality and integrity of its academic programs. In addition, upon application for candidacy, an applicant institution demonstrates that it meets the comprehensive standard for faculty qualifications.  (Faculty)
     
 

The Graduate School is in compliance with this requirement.

i.    In order to ensure the quality and integrity of its academic programs at the graduate level, the Graduate School requires that faculty members submit credentials for inspection and votes at the department level, the college level, and the Graduate School level.  All graduate faculty must undergo certification at these levels and be approved by the Graduate Council.  Every six years, all graduate faculty members must be reappointed.  The forms for new applicants and for confirmation and reappointment are available on the Graduate School’s website:

           http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/
           click on “FACULTY-STAFF”
           click on “Graduate Faculty-Application Forms:  For new applicants”

ii.    General requirements for graduate faculty membership can be found at
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/opmanual/OP64.10.pdf

   
     
2.9. The institution, through ownership or formal arrangements or agreements, provides and supports student and faculty access and user privileges to adequate library collections as well as to other learning/information resources consistent with the degrees offered. These collections and resources are sufficient to support all its educational, research, and public service programs. (Learning Resources and Services)
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
2.10 The institution provides student support programs, services, and activities consistent with its mission that promote student learning and enhance the development of its students. (Student Support Services)
     
 

The Graduate School is in compliance with this requirement.

The mission of the Graduate School includes “assisting and supporting the recruitment, retention, and graduation of quality students.”  Services provided by the Graduate School may be found on the Graduate School website http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/

Here are some of the services that the Graduate School provides: 

i.    The Graduate School’s Gelin Loan Program has been very successful.  Since it was instituted in 1999, more than 350 graduate students have taken advantage of it.  Details about the program may be found at         

          http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/
          click on “Current Students”
          click on “Gelin Emergency Loan Fund”

ii.   The Graduate School’s Thesis/Dissertation Workshop and Thesis/Dissertation Symposia have been useful in helping to prepare graduate students for these milestone writing research efforts.  Details about these projects are available in the office of the Graduate School.

iii.   The Graduate and Professional Student Government Association (GPSGA) has been supportive of student travel, subsidized childcare for students, and various other services. 
See  http://www.orgs.ttu.edu/gpsga

   
     
2.11

The institution has a sound financial base and demonstrated financial stability, and adequate physical resources to support the mission of the institution and the scope of its programs and services.

The member institution provides the following financial statements: (a) an institutional audit (or Standard Review Report issued in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the AICPA for those institutions audited as part of a systemwide or statewide audit) and written institutional management letter for the most recent fiscal year prepared by an independent certified public accountant and/or an appropriate governmental auditing agency employing the appropriate audit (or Standard Review Report) guide; (b) a statement of financial position of unrestricted net assets, exclusive of plant assets and plant-related debt, which represents the change in unrestricted net assets attributable to operations for the most recent year; and, (c) an annual budget that is preceded by sound planning, is subject to sound fiscal procedures, and is approved by the governing board.

Audit requirements for applicant institutions may be found in the Commission policy entitled "Accreditation Procedures for Applicant Institutions.  (Resources)

     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
   
2.12 The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan and demonstrate that the plan is part of an ongoing planning and evaluation process.  (Quality Enhancement Plan).

(Not applicable for the Compliance Certification submitted by institution).

     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
   

Section 3:  COMPREHENSIVE STANDARDS

     

Institutional Mission, Governance, And Effectiveness

3.1  Institutional Mission
   
3.1.1 The institution has a clear and comprehensive mission statement that guides it; is approved
by the governing board; is periodically reviewed by the board; and is communicated to the
institution’s constituencies.
     
  The Graduate School is in compliance with this standard.

The mission statement for the Graduate School can be found in the Graduate School’s strategic plan:
          http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/
          click on “FACULTY-STAFF”
          click on “Strategic Plan for Graduate Education-2003”

     
     
3.2  Governance and Administration
   
3.2.1 The governing board of the institution is responsible for the selection and the evaluation of
the chief executive officer.
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
3.2.2 The legal authority and operating control of the institution are clearly defined for the following
areas within the institution’s governance structure:
  3.2.2.1 the institution’s mission;
  3.2.2.2 the fiscal stability of the institution;
  3.2.2.3 institutional policy, including policies concerning related and affiliated corporate
entities and all auxiliary services;
  3.2.2.4 related foundations (athletic, research, etc.) and other corporate entities whose
primary purpose is to support the institution and/or its programs.
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
3.2.3 The board has a policy addressing conflict of interest for its members.
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
3.2.4 The governing board is free from undue influence from political, religious, or other external
bodies, and protects the institution from such influence.
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
3.2.5 Members of the governing board can be dismissed only for cause and by due process.
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
3.2.6 There is a clear and appropriate distinction, in writing and practice, between the policy-making
functions of the governing board and the responsibility of the administration and
faculty to administer and implement policy
.
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
3.2.7 The institution has a clearly defined and published organizational structure that delineates
responsibility for the administration of policies.
     
  The Graduate School is in compliance with this standard.

The organization chart for the Graduate School can be found in the office of the Graduate School at Room 2 of Holden Hall.

     
     
3.2.8

The institution has qualified administrative and academic officers with the experience,
competence, and capacity to lead the institution.

     
  The Graduate School is in compliance with this standard.

All of the deans in the Graduate School hold the Ph.D. degree.  Furthermore, the deans have served as chairs of departments, interim deans of colleges, and associate deans of colleges.

     
     
3.2.9

The institution defines and publishes policies regarding appointment and employment of
faculty and staff.

     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
     
     
3.2.10 The institution evaluates the effectiveness of its administrators, including the chief executive
officer, on a periodic basis.
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
     
     
3.2.11 The institution’s chief executive officer has ultimate responsibility for, and exercises
appropriate administrative and fiscal control over, the institution’s intercollegiate athletics
program.
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
3.2.12 The institution’s chief executive officer has ultimate control of the institution’s fund-raising
activities.
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
3.2.13 Any institution-related foundation not controlled by the institution has a contractual or other
formal agreement that (a) accurately describes the relationship between the institution and

the foundation, and (b) describes any liability associated with that relationship. In all cases,
the institution ensures that the relationship is consistent with its mission.
     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
   
     
3.2.14

The institution’s policies are clear concerning ownership of materials, compensation,
copyright issues, and the use of revenue derived from the creation and production of all
intellectual property. This applies to students, faculty and staff.

     
  Narrative:   Not applicable to unit level.
     
3.3  Institutional Effectiveness
   
3.3.1

The institution identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and its
administrative and educational support services; assesses whether it achieves these
outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of those results.

     
 

The Graduate School is in compliance with this standard.

i.   An important element of assessment that the Graduate School performs is the Graduate Program Reviews of all of the units in TTU that offer graduate degrees.  Since 1999-2000, twenty-four units have been reviewed.  All of the data pertaining to these reviews are available in the Graduate Dean’s office in Room 2 of Holden Hall.  The expected outcomes of these reviews are a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the units, a more apparent vision of what the needs of the units are, and a clear starting point for making changes and improvements in the units.  In an effort to evaluate quality, data are collected from peer institutions for each program and used to benchmark program performance.  Data are collected on number and type of degrees, salaries, operating expenses, citations in publications, placement of graduate students, etc.  For a complete list of recommended benchmarks, please refer to
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/review_guidelines.htm

     After the self studies are completed and a committee reviews the results, the committee, the Chair of the program, the program’s college Dean, the Dean Graduate School, and the Provost meet to go over the review.  The Dean of the College writes a plan of action for the unit based on the findings.  The following year, the Dean of the Graduate School, the Dean of the College, and the Chair of the program meet to determine what actions have occurred and to recommend any further actions.

ii.   All graduate students who submit theses or dissertations are required to fill out a “Post-Graduate Survey” at the time that the thesis or dissertation is turned in.  On this form, students are asked to rate the various elements of TTU that they may have opinions about:  major professors, graduate advisors, computer service, student services, library, etc.  This form amounts to the students’ assessment of their experience at TTU.

iii.  The Graduate School’s planning and evaluation processes may be found in its strategic plan:

          http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/
          click on “FACULTY-STAFF”
          click on “Strategic Plan for Graduate School-2003”

Planning processes are shown as “strategies” and evaluation processes are shown as “assessments.”

The following are quantitative data for assessment of our strategic planning:

GRADUATE SCHOOL
Area/Unit Specific Information

Calendar Year

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FELLOWSHIP SUPPORT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Student Count

 

 

 

 

 

 

   SBC Chancellor’s Fellowship

84

117

105

107

93

89

   Health and Social Services

7

11

11

6

14

11

   Hazlewood Fellowship

 

 

9

9

5

8

   DeVitt Jones Fellowship

 

 

 

6

10

6

   Cash Family Fellowship

 

 

 

 

1

1

   Waterman Scholarship

 

2

4

5

9

3

   Summer/Dissertation/Thesis

50

52

46

50

50

50

   Junction Summer Scholarship

10

10

10

8

9

10