| |
|
Name of Unit:
Graduate School |
|
Date: June 21,
2004 |
|
|
|
Section 2: CORE REQUIREMENTS |
| |
|
|
|
2.1
|
The institution has degree-granting authority from the
appropriate government agency or agencies.
(Degree-granting Authority) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
|
|
2.2
|
The institution has a governing board of at least five members
that is the legal body with specific authority over the
institution. The board is an active policy-making body for the
institution and is
ultimately responsible for ensuring that the
financial resources of the institution are adequate to provide a
sound educational program. The board is not controlled by a
minority of board members or
by organizations or interests
separate from it. Neither the presiding officer of the board nor
the majority of other voting members of the board have
contractual, employment, or personal or familial
financial
interest in the institution.
A military institution authorized
and operated by the federal government to award degrees has a
public board in which neither the presiding officer nor a
majority
of the other members are civilian employees of the
military or active/retired military. The board has broad and
significant influence upon the institution’s programs and
operations, plays an active role in
policy-making, and ensures
that the financial resources of the institution are used to
provide a sound educational program. The board is not controlled
by a minority of board members or by organizations
or interests
separate from the board except as specified by the authorizing
legislation. Neither the presiding officer of the board nor the
majority of other voting board members have contractual,
employment, or personal or familial financial interest in the
institution. (Governing Board)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.3 |
The institution has a chief executive officer whose primary
responsibility is to the institution and who is not the
presiding officer of the board. (Chief Executive
Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.4
|
The institution has a clearly defined and published mission
statement specific to the institution and appropriate to an
institution of higher education, addressing teaching and
learning and, where applicable, research and public service.
(Institutional Mission) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.5
|
The institution engages in
ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based
planning and evaluation processes that incorporate a systematic
review of programs and services that (a)
results in continuing
improvement and (b) demonstrates that the institution is
effectively accomplishing its mission.
(Institutional
Effectiveness) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Graduate School is in compliance with this requirement.
The
Graduate School engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide
research-based planning and evaluation processes. These activities are
reflected in the TTU strategic plan. The strategic plan for the Graduate
School may be found at
The strategic plan for the
Graduate School may be found here:
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/Images/Academics/strategic_plan/StrategicPlan.htm
Planning
process are shown as “strategies” and evaluation processes are shown as
“assessments”
In
addition to the Strategic Plan, which is reviewed periodically, the Graduate
School conducts Program Reviews of the graduate programs of all the
departments and colleges at TTU. From 1972 to 1985, these reviews were in
place. In 1985, a budget crisis forced TTU to scale back on such
activities. In 1999-2000, the reviews were reinstituted, and, since then,
twenty-four units have been reviewed. All of the data pertaining to these
reviews are available in the Graduate Dean’s office.
Examples of continuing improvement may be found at Graduate School offices.
The document is labeled
“Name of
Program, Graduate Program Review, 1997-2003”
As an Example: “Civil Engineering, Graduate Program Review, 1996-2002”
These planning and evaluation processes
directly support our mission and can be found here: http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/review_guidelines.htm
This document contains the schedule of graduate program reviews needed to
review all program at the Texas Tech, type of information gathered for
review, preparation of self study, selection of review committee members,
the review process, assessment of report, action of the Dean, and the follow
up. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.6 |
The institution is in
operation and has students enrolled in degree programs.
(Continuous Operation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.7 |
The institution |
| |
2.7.1 |
offers one or
more degree programs based on at least 60 semester credit hours or
the equivalent at the associate level; at least 120 semester credit
hours or the equivalent at the baccalaureate level; or at least 30
semester credit hours or the equivalent at the
post-baccalaureate, graduate, or professional level. The institution
provides a written justification and rationale for program
equivalency. (Program Length) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
The Graduate School is in
compliance with this requirement.
All graduate programs require
at least 30 semester credit hours; see page 65 (“Master’s Programs) and on
page 67 (Ph.D. programs) of the Texas Tech University Catalog, 2003-2004.
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/officialpublications/catalog/Catalog.html |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
2.7.2 |
offers degree programs that embody a coherent
course of study that is compatible with its stated purpose and
is based upon fields of study appropriate to higher education.
(Program Content) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
The Graduate School is in
compliance with this requirement.
All new courses and programs
are reviewed and approved by faculty committees. The guidelines for new
programs may be found in
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/opmanual/OP36.04.htm
The Graduate Council has a
subcommittee for program review. The subcommittee reviews all new programs
and program changes and then makes recommendations to the Graduate Council
as a whole. The faculty members proposing the new programs or program
changes are asked to present the details of their program to the Graduate
Council. Upon approval of the program, the program is then sent to the
Academic Council for their approval and then to the Provost. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
2.7.3 |
requires in each undergraduate degree program
the successful completion
of a general education component at the collegiate level that is
(1) a substantial component of each undergraduate degree, (2)
ensures breadth of knowledge, and (3) is based on a coherent
rationale. For degree completion in
associate programs, the component constitutes a minimum of 15
semester hours or the equivalent; for baccalaureate programs, a
minimum of 30 semester
hours or the equivalent. These credit
hours are to be drawn from and include at least one course from
each of the following areas: humanities/fine arts;
social/behavioral sciences; and natural
science/mathematics. The
courses do not narrowly focus on those skills, techniques, and
procedures specific to a particular occupation or profession.
The institution provides a written
justification and rationale
for course equivalency. (General Education) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
2.7.4 |
provides instruction for all course work
required for at least one degree program at each
level at which if awards degree. If the institution
makes arrangements for some
instruction to be provided
by other accredited institutions or entities through contracts
or consortia, or
uses some
other alternative approach to meeting this requirement, the
alternative approach must be approved by the Commission on
Colleges. In all cases, the institution demonstrates that
it controls all aspects of its educational program.
(Contractual Agreements for
Instruction) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.8 |
The number of full-time faculty members is
adequate to support the mission of the institution. The
institution has adequate faculty resources to ensure the quality
and integrity of its academic
programs. In addition, upon
application for candidacy, an applicant institution demonstrates
that it meets the comprehensive standard for faculty
qualifications.
(Faculty) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Graduate School is in
compliance with this requirement.
i. In order to ensure the
quality and integrity of its academic programs at the graduate level, the
Graduate School requires that faculty members submit credentials for
inspection and votes at the department level, the college level, and the
Graduate School level. All graduate faculty must undergo certification at
these levels and be approved by the Graduate Council. Every six years, all
graduate faculty members must be reappointed. The forms for new applicants
and for confirmation and reappointment are available on the Graduate
School’s website:
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/
click on “FACULTY-STAFF”
click on “Graduate Faculty-Application Forms: For new applicants”
ii. General requirements
for graduate faculty membership can be found at
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/opmanual/OP64.10.pdf |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2.9. |
The institution, through ownership or formal
arrangements or agreements, provides and supports student and
faculty access and user privileges to adequate library
collections as well as to other
learning/information resources
consistent with the degrees offered. These collections and
resources are sufficient to support all its educational,
research, and public service programs. (Learning
Resources and Services) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 2.10 |
The institution provides student support
programs, services, and activities consistent with its mission
that promote student learning and enhance the development of its
students. (Student Support Services) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Graduate School is in
compliance with this requirement.
The mission of the Graduate
School includes “assisting and supporting the recruitment, retention, and
graduation of quality students.”
Services provided by the
Graduate School may be found on the Graduate School website
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/
Here are some of the
services that the Graduate School provides:
i. The Graduate School’s Gelin Loan Program has been very successful. Since it was instituted in
1999, more than 350 graduate students have taken advantage of it. Details
about the program may be found at
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/
click on “Current Students”
click on “Gelin Emergency Loan Fund”
ii. The Graduate School’s
Thesis/Dissertation Workshop and Thesis/Dissertation Symposia have been
useful in helping to prepare graduate students for these milestone writing
research efforts. Details about these projects are available in the office
of the Graduate School.
iii. The Graduate and
Professional Student Government Association (GPSGA) has been supportive of
student travel, subsidized childcare for students, and various other
services.
See
http://www.orgs.ttu.edu/gpsga |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 2.11 |
The institution has a sound
financial base and demonstrated financial stability, and
adequate physical resources to support the mission of the
institution and the scope of its programs and services.
The
member institution provides the following financial statements: (a)
an institutional audit (or Standard Review Report issued in
accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and
Review Services issued by the AICPA for those institutions
audited as part of a systemwide or
statewide audit) and written institutional management letter for the most recent
fiscal year
prepared by an independent certified public
accountant and/or an appropriate governmental auditing agency employing the
appropriate audit (or Standard Review Report) guide; (b) a
statement of financial position of unrestricted net assets,
exclusive of plant assets and plant-related debt, which
represents the change in unrestricted net assets attributable to
operations for
the most recent year; and, (c) an annual budget
that is preceded by sound planning, is subject to sound fiscal
procedures, and is approved by the governing board.
Audit
requirements for applicant institutions may be found in the
Commission policy entitled "Accreditation Procedures for
Applicant Institutions.
(Resources) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
| |
|
| 2.12 |
The institution
has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan and
demonstrate that the plan is part of an ongoing planning and
evaluation process. (Quality Enhancement Plan).
(Not
applicable for the Compliance Certification submitted by
institution). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Section 3: COMPREHENSIVE STANDARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional
Mission, Governance, And Effectiveness |
|
3.1 Institutional
Mission |
|
|
|
|
3.1.1
|
The institution
has a clear and comprehensive mission statement that guides it;
is approved
by the governing board; is periodically reviewed by the board;
and is communicated to the
institution’s constituencies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Graduate School is in
compliance with this standard.
The mission statement for the
Graduate School can be found in the Graduate School’s strategic plan:
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/
click on “FACULTY-STAFF”
click on “Strategic Plan for Graduate Education-2003” |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2 Governance and
Administration |
|
|
|
|
3.2.1 |
The governing
board of the institution is responsible for the selection and
the evaluation of
the chief executive officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.2 |
The legal
authority and operating control of the institution are clearly
defined for the following
areas within the institution’s governance structure: |
| |
3.2.2.1 |
the institution’s
mission; |
| |
3.2.2.2 |
the fiscal
stability of the institution; |
| |
3.2.2.3 |
institutional policy, including policies concerning related
and affiliated corporate
entities and all auxiliary services; |
| |
3.2.2.4 |
related foundations (athletic, research, etc.) and other
corporate entities whose
primary purpose is to support the institution and/or its
programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.3 |
The board has a policy
addressing conflict of interest for its members. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.4 |
The governing board is free
from undue influence from political, religious, or other
external
bodies, and protects the institution from such influence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.5 |
Members of the governing
board can be dismissed only for cause and by due process. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.6 |
There is a clear and
appropriate distinction, in writing and practice, between the
policy-making
functions of the governing board and the responsibility of the
administration and
faculty to administer and implement policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.7 |
The institution
has a clearly defined and published organizational structure
that delineates
responsibility for the administration of policies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Graduate School is in
compliance with this standard. The organization chart for the
Graduate School can be found in the office of the Graduate School at Room 2
of Holden Hall. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.8 |
The institution has
qualified administrative and academic officers with the
experience,
competence, and capacity to lead the institution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Graduate School is in
compliance with this standard. All of the deans in the
Graduate School hold the Ph.D. degree. Furthermore, the deans have served
as chairs of departments, interim deans of colleges, and associate deans of
colleges. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 3.2.9 |
The institution
defines and publishes policies regarding appointment and
employment of
faculty and staff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.10 |
The institution evaluates
the effectiveness of its administrators, including the chief
executive
officer, on a periodic basis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.11 |
The institution’s
chief executive officer has ultimate responsibility for, and
exercises
appropriate administrative and fiscal control over, the
institution’s intercollegiate athletics
program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.12 |
The institution’s
chief executive officer has ultimate control of the
institution’s fund-raising
activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.13 |
Any
institution-related foundation not controlled by the
institution has a contractual or other
formal agreement that (a) accurately describes the relationship
between the institution and
the foundation, and (b) describes any liability associated with
that relationship. In all cases,
the institution ensures that the relationship is consistent with
its mission. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3.2.14 |
The institution’s
policies are clear concerning ownership of materials,
compensation,
copyright issues, and the use of revenue derived from the
creation and production of all
intellectual property. This applies to students, faculty and
staff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative:
Not applicable to
unit level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 Institutional
Effectiveness |
|
|
|
|
3.3.1 |
The institution
identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and
its
administrative and educational support services; assesses
whether it achieves these
outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis
of those results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Graduate School is in
compliance with this standard.
i. An
important element of assessment that the Graduate School performs is the
Graduate Program Reviews
of all of the units in TTU that offer graduate degrees. Since 1999-2000,
twenty-four units have been reviewed. All of the data pertaining to these
reviews are available in the Graduate Dean’s office in Room 2 of Holden
Hall. The expected outcomes of these reviews are a better understanding of
the strengths and weaknesses of the units, a more apparent vision of what
the needs of the units are, and a clear starting point for making changes
and improvements in the units. In an effort to evaluate quality, data are
collected from peer institutions for each program and used to benchmark
program performance. Data are collected on number and type of degrees,
salaries, operating expenses, citations in publications, placement of
graduate students, etc. For a complete list of recommended benchmarks,
please refer to
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/review_guidelines.htm
After the self studies are
completed and a committee reviews the results, the committee, the Chair of
the program, the program’s college Dean, the Dean Graduate School, and the
Provost meet to go over the review. The Dean of the College writes a plan
of action for the unit based on the findings. The following year, the Dean
of the Graduate School, the Dean of the College, and the Chair of the
program meet to determine what actions have occurred and to recommend any
further actions.
ii. All graduate students who
submit theses or dissertations are required to fill out a “Post-Graduate
Survey” at the time that the thesis or dissertation is turned in. On this
form, students are asked to rate the various elements of TTU that they may
have opinions about: major professors, graduate advisors, computer service,
student services, library, etc. This form amounts to the students’
assessment of their experience at TTU.
iii. The Graduate School’s
planning and evaluation processes may be found in its strategic plan:
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/
click on “FACULTY-STAFF”
click on “Strategic Plan for Graduate School-2003”
Planning processes are shown as “strategies” and evaluation processes
are shown as “assessments.”
The following are quantitative
data for assessment of our strategic planning:
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Area/Unit Specific Information
|
Calendar Year |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FELLOWSHIP SUPPORT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Count |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBC Chancellor’s
Fellowship |
84 |
117 |
105 |
107 |
93 |
89 |
|
Health and Social
Services |
7 |
11 |
11 |
6 |
14 |
11 |
|
Hazlewood
Fellowship |
|
|
9 |
9 |
5 |
8 |
|
DeVitt Jones
Fellowship |
|
|
|
6 |
10 |
6 |
|
Cash Family
Fellowship |
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
Waterman
Scholarship |
|
2 |
4 |
5 |
9 |
3 |
|
Summer/Dissertation/Thesis |
50 |
52 |
46 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
|
Junction Summer
Scholarship |
10 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |